JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 9, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Claudia Maria Botero Montoya (Edificio Maria Auxiliadora) Vs. Juzgado Segundo Promiscuo Municipal De Sabaneta

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre La Sala Penal Del Tribunal Superior De Medellin Y El Juzgado Civil Del Circuito De Envigado - Antioquia. Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Sala Penal Del Tribunal Superior De Medellin
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • Puede vincular a otra persona o entidad al proceso
Acción De Tutela
  • Decreto 1382 de 2000 no establece competencia sino reglas de simple reparto
  • Todos los jueces son constitucionales y su especialidad no es relevante para establecer la competencia
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia a prevención
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Medellin, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la accion de tutela del Edificio Maria Auxiliadora contra el Juzgado 2deg Promiscuo Municipal de Sabaneta.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.